Legal Opinion

In re Steele

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1872PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. Erastus S. Williams, Judge, presiding. This proceeding originated in the county court of Lake county, and was taken by appeal to the circuit court, and from the order of the latter court the guardians appealed to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

This was a proceeding to compel guardians to account for moneys received by them.

The rules and principles of equity must, to a certain extent, prevail in such an adjudication. Guardians, at common law, were treated as trustees, and as such were held responsible for the faithful discharge of the duties imposed upon them. The aid of courts of chancery has always been invoked for a compulsion of the execution of the trusts, and the protection of the infant. In this respect the statute has made no change, but has given a summary power to the county court to.oblige guardians to render accounts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bond v. LockwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Dixon v. BuellIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Gilbert v. GuptillIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. American Surety Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bliss v. SeamanIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Maynard v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Parsons v. BalsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Cheney v. RoodhouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API