Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1993No. 93-02736PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Calvin Smith appeals the denial of a motion to correct illegal sentence and an un-sworn “motion to dismiss” court-appointed counsel’s lien for fees. We affirm.

The only allegation of merit is appellant’s claim that he did not receive prior notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding the assessment of court-appointed counsel’s fees. If true, appellant would be entitled to relief. See Townsend v. State, 604 So.2d 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Smiley v. State, 590 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Buiey v. State, 583 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court denied relief, erroneously holding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Judge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Townsend v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Smiley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Buiey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Riddell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Whitehurst v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API