Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Flores

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1979No. Docket Nos. 18751, 19062PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

In these consolidated appeals, we consider the lawfulness of a warrantless search immediately following a valid arrest and the validity of an ensuing search warrant. We conclude that both of the challenged searches were lawful thus requiring reversal of the order of dismissal in Criminal No. 18751 and affirmance of the judgment in Criminal No. 19062. We explain our reasons hereafter.

Statement of the Case

Criminal No. 18751: Defendant was arrested and charged with violations of Health and Safety Code sections 11378 (possession for sale of phencyclidine or PCP) and 11359…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hinkel v. AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. BullwinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API