Legal Opinion

Wood v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1922No. 3 Div. 432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSampord, J.

There were many objections and exceptions l-eserved during the trial, many of which axve clearly without merit, and while we have i-ead and considered them, as the law requires, it will serve the pui'pose of this appeal to treat only such exceptions as have been specifically pointed out in brief of counsel, who have therein presented every question of merit.

It is here insisted that the court erred in permitting the witxiess Naftel to refresh his recollection as to certain articles of merchandise alleged to have been sold to one Monerief, and from which package a part had been stolen; but no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leverett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Waters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Eldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Johnson v. Zurich General AcciDent & Liability Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API