Manchester Paper-Mills Co. v. Heth
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to hustings court of Manchester; John H. Ingram, J udge. Action qf covenant by Heth, trustee, against the Manchester Paper-Mills Company, for rent for water privilege. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
This is a writ of error to a judgment of the hustings court of the city of Manchester, rendered on the. 27th day of January, 1892, in an action of covenant therein then pending, wherein Henry Heth, surviving trustee of himself and Wal*777ter K. Martin and C. C. McEae, trustees, was plaintiff, and the Manchester Paper-Mills Company, a corporation chartered under the laws of the state of Virginia, was defendant. This case, briefly stated, is this : In November, 1865, Thomas Vaden, Jr., of the first part, and S. C. Eobinson, E. T. Eobinson, and Samuel Fairbanks, partners under the style of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gray v. BlanchardSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by1 opinion
- McDonald Colliery Co. v. CrottyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911