Legal Opinion

Vanderberg v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 15, 2000No. 1D99-903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court should not have dismissed appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bandy v. SheffieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Gosman v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rowe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000