Legal Opinion
Vanderberg v. Moore
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 15, 2000No. 1D99-903PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The trial court should not have dismissed appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bandy v. SheffieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Gosman v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rowe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000