Legal Opinion

Vippolis v. Village Of Haverstraw

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 16, 1985No. 910PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

768 F.2d 40

Roger VIPPOLIS and Deborah Vippolis,

Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,

v.

The VILLAGE OF HAVERSTRAW and the Haverstraw Village Police

Department, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

Nos. 839, 910, Dockets 84-7046, 84-7944.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued March 7, 1985.

Decided July 16, 1985.

Michael F. Close, New York City (Barry, McTiernan & Moore, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants-cross-appellees.

Harry E. Youtt, New York City (Herbert W. Fischman, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants.

Before TIMBERS,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Pollnow v. GlennonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Vippolis v. Village of HaverstrawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Cash v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Ricciuti v. N.Y.C. Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Ricciuti v. Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Dodd v. City of NorwichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Dove v. Fordham UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API