Legal Opinion

Kraft, Inc. v. Missouri Farmer's Assoc., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1991No. 17335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Judge.

Appellant, Kraft, Inc. (Kraft), appeals from a judgment in garnishment. Rule 90.17. The judgment was entered for respondent, Missouri Farmer’s Association, Inc. (MFA), against Kraft for “sums due under garnishment.” The judgment was directed to sums Kraft owed Kenneth Nance and Carol Nance, MFA’s judgment debtors, for milk Kraft had purchased from them. This court affirms.

Kraft presents one point on appeal. Kraft contends that “[t]he trial court erred in denying defendant Kraft’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Motion for Directed Verdict made at the close of all the evidence…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Central Kansas Production Credit Ass'n v. Washington Sales Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Ensminger v. BurtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Farmers State Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. First National Bank in Lenox v. Lamoni Livestock Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Blanton v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Food Services of America v. Royal Heights, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Carden v. Missouri Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Thurman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Shafinia v. NashMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Carden v. MISSOURI INTERGOV. RISK MANAGEM., ASSOC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API