Legal Opinion
United States v. Wilms
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2007No. 06-1896PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
DefendanL-Appellant Blake Wilms (“Wilms”) appeals his sentence of sixty-three months in prison following his plea of guilty to four counts of bank robbery and one count of attempted bank robbery. Wilms argues that the district court improperly applied a presumption of reasonableness to the applicable Guidelines range, thereby failing to consider properly the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Because the record indicates that the district court applied a rebuttable presumption that Wilms should be sentenced within the applicable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Leonard Jermain WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Marco Eugene ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Lonnie DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. ConatserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ConlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GuillenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.