Legal Opinion

Haavistola v. Community Fire Co. of Rising Sun

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1993No. 93-1286PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERVIN, Chief Judge: .

Paula Haavistola brought an action against Community Fire Company of Rising Sun, Inc. (“Fire Company”), alleging discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (“Title VII”). The district court granted summary judgment for the Fire Company on grounds that the Fire Company was not a state actor for the purposes of section 1983 and that Haavistola was not an employee covered by Title VII. Haavistola appeals the grant of summary judgment on both claims. Finding summary judgment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mark v. Borough of HatboroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Mark v. Borough of HatboroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Clay Vance Conner v. Kerry Donnelly, M.D., Clay Vance Conner v. Kerry Donnelly, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Paula Haavistola v. Community Fire Company Of Rising Sun, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Etefia v. East Baltimore Community Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API