Legal Opinion
In re Perelstine
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1926No. 11702PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
We have a motion on the part of the bankrupt to dismiss specification of objections filed by Selz, Schwab & Co., Albert H. Weinbrenner, and the American Seating Company. This motion must prevail as to Albert H. Weinbrenner and the American Seating Company, for, so far as they are concerned, the objections have not been verified. This leaves for our consideration only the sufficiency of the specification filed by Selz, Schwab & Co.
The first thing to notice is the question of whether or not the specification sufficiently shows that Selz, Schwab & Co. are entitled,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
- In re ServisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1905
- In re Milgraum & OstDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
- In re ReedDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1911
- In re FriceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re BiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- In re EmeryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934