Legal Opinion

State v. Pinnick

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1937No. 958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By PUNK, PJ.

The four defendants were jointly indicted, tried and convicted of burglarizing a certain safe of the Sweet Clover Dairy Co. of Wooster, Ohio, which contained money to the amount of about two hundred and twenty-five dollars ($225).

The -only errors complained of are:

“1. That the court erred in overruling the motion of each of the defendants at the close of the state’s case for a directed verdict.
“2: That the verdict is manifestly against the weight of the evidence.”

A determination of both of these questions required the reading of the bill of exceptions, which has been done…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Akron v. MolyneauxOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State v. CantuOhio Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API