State v. Good
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentKrucker, Judge
I concur with my colleagues as to the dismissal of the seventeen cases in which no notice of appeal was filed. However, I am of the opinion that No. 2 CA-CR 153 likewise should be dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, i. e., lack of jurisdiction of the person.
I have no quarrel with the basic proposition that such “jurisdictional” question may .be waived by failure to raise a timely objection. 4A C.J.S. Appeal & Error § 595b. The majority appears to predicate its finding of waiver upon lack of a timely objection, and therein I disagree. It would require more than filing a designation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Szafranski v. RadetzkyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Baumgarten v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- W. H. Dreves, Inc. v. Oslo School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Winchester v. Winn and Winn Const. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Bray Clothing Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.