Legal Opinion
Powell v. Coffee Beanery, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 7, 1997No. Civil Action No. 96-40202; Companion Case No. 96-40087Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MORGAN’S FEBRUARY 12,1997 ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
On February 21, 1996, plaintiff William Andrew Powell (“Powell”) filed an action in Los Angeles Superior Court against defendant, The Coffee Beanery Ltd. (“TCB”), alleging two counts: negligent misrepresentation (Count I) and a violation of § 31119 of the California Franchise Investment Law (“CFIL”) (Count II). TCB subsequently removed the action to the United States District Court for the Central District of Florida, and on April 26, 1996,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thiokol Corporation v. Department Of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Donald Lindley and Rita Lindley v. General Electric Company, Etc., and Stone & Webster Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Barnes v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Wallis v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.