Legal Opinion

International Time Recording Co. v. Southern Surety Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 8, 1932Published

1Per curiam

The bond set forth in the complaint provides that any one furnishing materials or rendering services to the principal may maintain an action on the bond as though named therein. Under such circumstances the plaintiff, which, it is alleged, furnished labor and materials for which it has not been paid, can maintain this action against the defendant surety company as one of the beneficiaries for whose protection the bond was required to be given. (Strong v. American Fence Construction Co., 245 N. Y. 48; Maltby & Sons v. Wade, 131 Misc. 143; affd., 224 App. Div. 779.) The complaint is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strong v. American Fence Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. George W. Maltby & Sons Co. v. WadeNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  3. George W. Maltby & Sons Co. v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API