Legal Opinion

Parker v. Foxworthy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Mills District Court. — Hon.-Thomas Arthur, Judge. Action of partition. The trial court sustained defendant’s claims to the property, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

The respective parties claim title to the real estate in controversy under and in virtue of the will of Jose Foxworthy, deceased, the material parts of which read as follows:

I hereby give to the heirs of my daughter, Eaehel Tubbs, now deceased, the sum of three hundred dollars ($300.00) to be divided between said heirs, share and share alike.

*650I héreby give, devise and bequeath all the rest and residue of my estate both real and personal, that I now own or may acquire and own at the time of my decease, to my beloved wife, Mary M. Foxworthy, for her sole use and benefit during her natural life.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kalbach v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Johnson v. BodineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Kling v. SchnellbeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Furenes v. SevertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LarsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Houts v. JamesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Claude v. SchuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Kramer v. LarsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Clapper v. ClapperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API