Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 2007No. 4273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStilwell, J.

William T. Hicks and Miss Kitty’s, Inc. (hereafter collectively Hicks) contend the master in equity erred in finding Hicks liable for fraud. We affirm. 1

FACTS

Hicks leased the property in question from Danny Enterprises in 1998. Hicks and Howard Hendricks entered into a contract in 2002, pursuant to which Hicks’ leasehold interest was assigned to Hendricks. Hendricks also purchased all the furniture, fixtures, equipment, inventory, and good will connected with the ongoing business and the premises. The contract also gave Hendricks the right to offset any loss or damage he incurred in the event…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Butler Contracting, Inc. v. Court Street, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. O'Shields v. Southern Fountain Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  4. Bivens v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Moseley v. ALL THINGS POSSIBLE, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Williams v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
  4. Kirby v. Red Bull North America, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API