Legal Opinion
Derdiarian v. Futterman Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 25, 1964PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, District Judge.
A motion to dismiss this action, which alleges violations of the Securities Acts, has been made by defendant Van Al-styne, Noel & Co. (“Van Alstyne”). The motion is addressed to the third amended complaint, which contains two counts. Plaintiff Derdiarian sues in his individual capacity as a purchaser of The Fut-terman Corporation stock and as a representative of other purchasers. The background of this action and the theory of the first count are both discussed in Derdiarian v. Futterman Corp., 223 F. Supp. 265 (S.D.N.Y.1963), which denied a motion to dismiss by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Mutation Mink Breeders Ass'n v. Lou Nierenberg Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Gloster v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Athas v. DayDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Northwestern National Insurance v. AlbertsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Nett v. BellucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Mason Tenders District Council Pension Fund v. MesseraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. v. E & C Trading Ltd. (In Re Crysen/Montenay Energy Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.