Cramer v. Winnick

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley L. Sklar, J.

The issue presented is whether the defendant is entitled to *716a new physical examination of the plaintiff, to substitute for the examination already held, because defense counsel recently received important information about the original examining physician. I hold that the defendant is not entitled to a new examination.

Defendant seeks a new physical examination of plaintiff Allen Cramer to replace the one already conducted by Dr. Gary Korenman, a neurologist, on April 26, 1991. Defendant’s request is based on counsel’s assertions that "certain very…