Legal Opinion
Teel v. United Technologies Pratt & Whitney
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided February 17, 1997No. 96-8405-CIVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AND STRIKING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE PRAYER FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES ON ALL CLAIMS UNDER FLORIDA LAW
HURLEY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon a motion to strike. Upon review of the record and the applicable case law, and for the reasons given below, the motion is granted.
I. FACTS
This litigation concerns alleged incidents of gender harassment against plaintiff Jo-ann Teel by employees of defendant Pratt & Whitney. After this court’s order granting in part a- motion to dismiss, the remaining counts are three: sexual harassment under Title VII;…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goldsmith v. City of AtmoreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Smith v. Department of Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Velazquez v. UPMC Bedford Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Pruett v. Erickson Air-Crane Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- Tutor Time Child Care Systems, Inc. v. Franks Investment Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1997
- Primerica Financial Services, Inc. v. MitchellDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.