Legal Opinion

Dancsecz v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 5, 1951No. Civ. A. 9248PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURNS, District Judge.

Plaintiff concedes that Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation must be eliminated as a party defendant, since both plaintiff and that corporation are citizens of New Jersey and federal jurisdiction here is asserted on the basis of diversity of citizenship.

*613After filing the instant complaint in this district, plaintiff now seeks a change of venue to New Jersey, where he resides and where the accident occurred. The defendants still in the case oppose the motion. I shall not attempt to decide the question left unanswered in Paramount Pictures v. Rodney, 3 Cir., 1951, 186 F.2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases). Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trader v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API