Legal Opinion

Wooton v. Brunsman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2006No. 2006-1559PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

{¶ 2} On June 22, 2006, Ronald L. Wooton, an inmate at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his immediate release from prison. Wooton claimed that his 1997 conviction and sentence for felonious sexual penetration is void because before he was indicted, the pertinent statute was repealed. Wooton also alleged that his defense counsel cooperated in forcing him to plead guilty to a lesser offense. Wooton failed to attach a copy of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bozsik v. HudsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Waites v. GansheimerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Fortson v. BradshawOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Turner v. IsheeOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wooton v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Everett v. EberlinOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. McDougald v. Bowerman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Miner v. Eberlin, 08-Be-21 (2-26-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. DeVore v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Billiter v. BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API