Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Mittler v. Curran

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 8, 1925No. 369PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Drastic as is the statute under which this deportation is ordered, we do not admit that it was meant to apply or does apply to persons so utterly separated from ¿1 countries but this, so completely a product of the United States, and so native in everything but the accident.of birth, as is this young woman. Tp prevent the hypocritical injustice involved in sending to Italy as to her home this product of American conditions, who knows considerably less about the land to which she is ordered than a reasonably intelligent American tripper does after one summer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MALONEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  2. Mirabal-Balon v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API