Riddle v. Bank of Montreal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, the Bank of Montreal and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of . New York on the 11th day of February, 1911, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, overruling the said defendants’' demurrers to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
The defendants, Bank of Montreal and United States Banking Company, separately demurred to the complaint upon the grounds: (1) That the court did not have jurisdiction of the sub.ject-matter of the action; and (2) that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrers were overruled and each appeals.
The complaint, in substance, charges that on the 8th of July, 1910, plaintiff recovered two judgments against the United States Banking Company, amounting to between $47,000 and $48,000, and on the following day executions were issued…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Lopez v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Wood v. . AmoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Beards v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Booth v. DodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bobrick v. Second National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Gonzalez v. Industrial Bank (of Cuba)New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Gonzalez v. Industrial BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Gonzalez v. Industrial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Wm. P. Harper & Son v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927