Legal Opinion

Kroemer v. Omaha Track Equip.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2017No. S-16-856PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 09/08/2017 08:12 AM CDT - 972 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports KROEMER v. OMAHA TRACK EQUIP. Cite as

296 Neb. 972

Norman K roemer, appellee, v. Omaha Track Equipment, L.L.C., and The Tie Yard of Omaha, now known as Omaha Track, I nc., appellees, and R ibbon Weld, LLC, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 16, 2017. No. S-16-856. 1. Statutes: Appeal and Error. Statutory interpretation presents a ques- tion of law, for which an appellate court has an obligation to reach an independent conclusion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of EvertsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Burns v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Turco v. SchuningNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. International Nutrition, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Turney v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gimple v. Student Transp. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Gimple v. Student Transp. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Jessica Vanicek v. Lyman-Richey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  4. Rushman v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API