Legal Opinion
Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided September 20, 2004No. C 98-2106-MWBPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
J. INTRODUCTION.976
II. LEGAL ANALYSIS.978
A. Donaldson’s Motion To Amend Judgment.978
1. Arguments of the parties.978
2. Applicable standards.979
3. Analysis.980
a. Double recovery.980
b. Improper enhancement.980
B. EPC’s Motion For Attorney Fees And Expenses.980
1. Arguments of the parties.980
2. Attorney fees and expenses.982
a. Applicable standards.982
b. Analysis.984
3. Expert witness fees.986
a. Applicable standards.986
b. Analysis.988
III…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.