Legal Opinion
State v. Cardosa
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 4, 1992No. 92-266PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
609 So.2d 152 (1992)
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Fred CARDOSA, Appellee.
No. 92-266.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
December 4, 1992.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A. Lucas, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellee.
2Per curiam
The State appeals an order suppressing evidence. The issue is whether the police officer's stop of the defendant's vehicle was pretextual. The standard in such cases is an objective one[1] and is not a subjective one where the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Kehoe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Monroe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Miller v. First American Bank & TrustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
4Cited by4 opinions
- Ferry v. AbramsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Castro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Alden Hotel Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014