State v. Sapp
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Morgan in her dissenting opinion. 144 N. J. Super. 455 at 460.
Three members of the Court would affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.
For reversal—Chief Justice Hughes, Justices P ashman and Clifford and Judge Oonfoed—4.
For affirmance—Justices Mountain, Sullivan and Sghreiber—3.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. SappNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ShippNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- State v. WhyteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- State v. ZapataNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- State v. PalacioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.