Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Barnhart
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 20, 2003No. 03-1657UnpublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Mark N. Bishop appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the Commissioner’s denial of social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. We affirm.
Bishop makes the following arguments on appeal: (1) the administrative law judge (ALJ) failed to consider all relevant evidence; (2) the ALJ erred in his weighing of the medical evidence; (3) the ALJ erred in his credibility determination; and (4) the ALJ violated Bishop’s Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection.
We must uphold the district court’s disability…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackie L. HAYS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Claireather M. Wilkins v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Charles E. Huckabee v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
4Cited by14 opinions
- Huddleston v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
- CHRISTIANSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONERDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Clark v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- Cordell v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Donta L. H. v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2026
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.