Legal Opinion

Blount v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1985No. 69893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

This is a case about duties. Appellant’s suit is based on allegations that the doctor who operated on his wife failed to perform his duties in obtaining consent and did so fraudulently. One of appel lant’s enumerations of error is that the trial court failed to perform its duty concerning what to take into account in considering summary judgment. As will appear, appellant failed to discharge his duties with respect to properly presenting the case for appellate review.

Joseph H. Blount appeals a grant of partial summary judgment to Dr, Moore on the grounds that he failed to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blount v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. State v. PikeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Wetherington v. Koepenick & Horne, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Pierce v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Acker v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Holy Fellowship Church of God in Christ v. First Community BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. MacK v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Springer v. GaffaglioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Acker v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API