Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State Ex Rel. Alabama State Milk Control Board

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 2, 1939No. 3 Div. 271PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The purpose of this litigation is to test the continued effect of the Milk Control Act of July 9, 1935 (see page 204), and to determine whether, if it is still in effect, it serves to justify the board in extending a milk shed after it is once created, so as to include territory occupied by appellant, and to determine, if it does have that effect, whether it is applicable to the particular nature of business conducted by appellant, all as heretofore interpreted by this Court in Franklin v. State, 232 Ala. 637, 169 So. 295.

Section 25 of the Act provides that it shall apply…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Franklin v. State Ex Rel. Alabama State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Berman v. Wreck-A-Pair Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. City of Decatur v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Morris v. SartainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alabama State Milk Control Board v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. James v. ToddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Board of Supervisors v. State Milk CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  4. Mississippi Milk Commission v. VanceMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Ex Parte Homewood Dairy Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API