Legal Opinion

Messier v. Ledoux

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 3, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

I. The plaintiff had no actual notice of the mortgage when he took his deed. He claims he is not chargeable with notice by its record in the registry office because of error in the mortgage in describing the property.

The mortgage described the property as lot 13 on a plan recorded on p. 527, vol. 403, of the Hillsborough registry, and lying on the west side of Willie street in Nashua, with a defined street frontage and depth of the lot. Except that no plan was recorded as stated, the description was correct.

The master found that the record of the mortgage gave the plaintiff legal notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. MayoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
  2. Peaslee v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Notinger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ex rel. Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-5 (In re Prescott)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  2. In Re PrescottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API