Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor, 06 Ap 832 (5-17-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 2007No. 06 AP 832PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Carrie L. Taylor, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas resentencing defendant pursuant to her guilty plea. Defendant assigns a single error:

APPLYING THE REMEDY CREATED IN STATE V. FOSTER AT DEFENDANT'S RE-SENTENCING HEARING VIOLATED DEFENDANT'S GUARANTEE TO DUE PROCESS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITION ON EX POST FACTO LAWS UNDER THE UNITED STATES AND OHIO CONSTITUTIONS.

Because the sentence the trial court imposed does not violate defendant's due process rights or the prohibition on ex post facto laws, we affirm.

{¶ 2} On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. White, 07ap-743 (2-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. Strickland, 06ap-1269 (3-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API