State v. Taylor, 06 Ap 832 (5-17-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Carrie L. Taylor, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas resentencing defendant pursuant to her guilty plea. Defendant assigns a single error:
APPLYING THE REMEDY CREATED IN STATE V. FOSTER AT DEFENDANT'S RE-SENTENCING HEARING VIOLATED DEFENDANT'S GUARANTEE TO DUE PROCESS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITION ON EX POST FACTO LAWS UNDER THE UNITED STATES AND OHIO CONSTITUTIONS.
Because the sentence the trial court imposed does not violate defendant's due process rights or the prohibition on ex post facto laws, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. White, 07ap-743 (2-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Strickland, 06ap-1269 (3-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008