Legal Opinion

The Doe Run Resources Corporation v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided August 17, 2021No. 4:20-cv-01019Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION THE DOE RUN RESOURCES ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:20-cv-01019-AGF ) ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE ) INSUR ANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company’s (“St. Paul”) Motion (ECF No. 17) to Dismiss Plaintiff The Doe Run Resources Corporation’s (“Doe Run”) complaint. St. Paul asserts that Doe Run’s claims are barred under the doctrines of issue preclusion and claim preclusion. For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re: Elisabeth Scarborough, Debtor. Mark E. Fischer, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Elisabeth Scarborough, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. George Lobrano, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Shahan v. ShahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Fag Bearings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API