Martinez v. Goddard
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FRANK R. ZAPATA, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and Plaintiffs Partial Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motions are granted and Plaintiffs motion is denied.
I. DISCUSSION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS
A. Standard of Review: Motion for Summary Judgment
Summary judgment is appropriate where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A genuine issue exists if “the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Liberty Coins v. David GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- David Charles Herring v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Crownholm v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Nandlal v. Oregon Cascade Properties LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021