Feyh v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In January, 1947, respondent ordered two printing presses from appellant at a specified price and terms of payment. The contract contained a clause providing that “ These prices subject to increase at vendor’s option to effective permitted legal prices prevailing on date of shipment with addition [sic] cash increase subject to same terms”. The presses were not ready for delivery to respondent’s premises until October, 1948, at which time appellant demanded the increased price then prevailing before it would make delivery. Respondent acceded to that demand, made the additional cash payment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Argus Co. v. . Mayor, Etc., of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. Hastings Terraces, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. LipowiczNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- J. Richard Dirose v. Pk Management Corp., Nicholas A. Demare, Frank Ciccarelli, John S. Russo, Harry Kursh, Anthony Curatolo and Jerome DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- VKK Corp. v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Livingston v. Bev-Pak, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Vkk Corporation v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Marine Midland Bank v. StukeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.