Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Chapman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1953No. 28,866PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmmert, C. J.

This appeal involves interlocutory proceedings had pending an action for divorce. The assignment of errors is as follows:

“1. The Trial Court erred in sustaining the Appellee’s demurrer to the Appellant’s ‘Amended Verified Plea in Abatement.’
“2. The Trial Court erred in sustaining Appellee’s demurrer to the Appellant’s ‘Motion to Set Aside and Quash the Summons and Notice to Appear, heretofore issued on the 9th day of November, 1951, and to Quash and Set Aside the Return of Service thereon.’
“3. The Court did not have jurisdiction of the action.”

It is well settled that an interlocutory appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Indiana Service Corp. v. Town of FloraIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Brown v. Doak Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bluffton v. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Boros v. MatherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haag v. HaagIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Anthrop v. Tippecanoe School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Pitts v. WooldridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Bell v. Wabash Valley Trust CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. VanoverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API