Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Social Services of the County v. Ruh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this filiation proceeding, petitioner was required to prove paternity by clear, convincing and satisfactory evidence that created a genuine belief that respondent is the father of the child (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Philip De G., 59 NY2d 137, 141-142; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of County of Erie v Michel, 93 AD2d 997). Upon our review of the hearing evidence, we conclude that petitioner satisfied that burden and that the court properly found that respondent is the father. Petitioner’s evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Social Services v. Philip De G.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Commissioner of Social Services v. MichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Richardson v. PutneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. TamolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Louise S. v. Timothy E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API