Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff’s Ford truck, while crossing Spruce Street, Philadelphia, at 58th Street, was struck by defendant’s street car. The verdict was for him. The court entered judgment for defendant n. o. v. The only debatable point now is whether plaintiff’s alleged contributory negligence was for the court or the jury.

There is little doubt that the judgment could be sustained if we had the power to find the facts as appellee states them: that plaintiff “had a clear and unobstructed *455view of a rapidly approaching trolley car of the defendant when he was 24 feet from the track, and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Philadelphia Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Hamilton v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Grupp v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Backus v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Short v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thorpe v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API