Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hamel

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 8, 1928PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The defendant was found guilty upon an indictment charging that she did unlawfully use a certain instrument upon the body of Elizabeth Bobbins with the intent to procure a miscarriage, which resulted in the death of said Bobbins. One Frosti was tried with the defendant as an accessory before the fact, and was found guilty.

The jury could have found on the evidence that the defendant occupied a house in Springfield and had at least two rooms therein for the care of the sick; that she had cared for women recuperating from miscarriages; that Frosti, who had been intimate with the Bobbins girl,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MadeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Commonwealth v. SpiropoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Commonwealth v. FestoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Commonwealth v. GangiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. KlosowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MakarewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Commonwealth v. CapalboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. OsmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. MacHadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Holton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API