Legal Opinion · Dissent

George v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1988No. F-85-737Published

1DissentParks, Judge

The pivotal issue is whether the appellant “willfully neglected” his children in violation of 21 O.S.1981, § 853. While willful neglect can be inferred from the surrounding circumstances, such neglect must be purposeful or without just cause and not merely a result of inability to pay. Ballard v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 420, 223 P.2d 782, 784 (1950); Williams v. State, 62 Okl.Cr. 298, 71 P.2d 496, 498 (1937); State v. McMains, 95 Okl.Cr. 176, 241 P.2d 976, 983 (1952). Therefore, the State was required to show that appellant’s failure to pay child support was intentional and not simply due to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ballard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. State v. McMainsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API