Legal Opinion

Boston & Albany Railroad v. Inhabitants of Charlton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

The directors of the Boston and Albany Railroad Company presented a petition to the Superior Court, under the first section of St. 1890, c. 428, for the abolition of three grade crossings in the town of Charlton, and, as appears from the report of the presiding justice, commissioners were duly appointed who reported “ in favor of the abolition of said crossings, and the way and manner of changing and separating the grades at said crossings, and their report was duly accepted by the court. In carrying out the provisions of said report it was necessary to take the land of various persons whose…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New Haven & Northampton Co. v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Gifford v. Inhabitants of DartmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Lindsey v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sears v. Inhabitants of NahantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Main v. County of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Maguire v. Pan-American Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Turner v. WoodardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
  5. Providence & Worcester RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API