Britton v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
By stipulation between counsel for the State and the defendant it was agreed that on the day the accused was arrested there was in operation in Fulton County, Georgia, a lottery known as the “number game;” and the manner in which the lottery was operated was detailed. This is the same lottery described in Turk v. State, 55 Ga. App. 732 (191 S. E. 283), and Cutcliff v. State, 51 Ga. App. 40 (179 S. E. 568), and so frequently before this court.
The Code, § 26-6502, declares: “Any person who, by himself or another, shall keep, maintain, employ, or carry on any lottery or other scheme or device…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cutcliff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Turk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Chilivis v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Fountain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950