Legal Opinion

United States v. Eric Powell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 6, 2017No. 14-2507PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J., joined by Boggs, J,

MOORE, J. (pp. 782-88), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendants Carlos Powell, Eric Powell, and Earnest Proge, Jr., were tried together and convicted of offenses arising out of a large-scale narcotics distribution operation in Detroit, Michigan.1 First, all three defendants challenge the district court’s orders denying their motions to suppress evidence derived from: (1) the collection of cellular-phone identification and location information; (2) the use of a GPS tracking device; and (3) the monitoring of video…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. HightowerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. KnuffOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. United States v. Andrew MooreheadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Dwayne ShecklesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Christopher May-ShawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API