Legal Opinion

Hanley v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1964No. 4683PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

THOMPSON, J.:

On this appeal we are asked to overrule a settled test relating to a motion to change the venue of a criminal trial. In State v. Alsup, 68 Nev. 45, 226 P.2d 801, we said: “It has long been established by decisions of this court that the proper procedure to determine the issue as to whether a defendant could have a fair and impartial trial in the county is the result obtained from examination of the panel. This is the proper test to ascertain the ultimate fact.” Accord: State v. Millain, 3 Nev. 409; State v. Gray, 19 Nev. 212, 8 P. 456; State v. Teeter, 65 Nev.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. TeeterNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. MillainNevada Supreme Court · 1867
  5. State v. GrayNevada Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bean v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mears v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bishop v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hanley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Peoples v. NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API