Legal Opinion

Maness v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1933No. 8 Div. 495PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The bill discloses that complainant has been duly appointed and qualified as the trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of George L. Maness, Jr., and as such authorized to institute this suit to have set aside a fraudulent transfer of certain real estate theretofore the property of said bankrupt. This character of suit is expressly authorized by the bankrupt laws, is very generally exercised, and the four months’ limitation has no reference to such a proceeding. 2 Remington on Bankruptcy, § 1216; 7 Corpus Juris, 247; Exchange Nat. Bank v. Stewart, Trustee, 158 Ala. 218, 48 So.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. City of Mobile v. McCown Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Howland v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Exchange National Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golden v. GoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API