Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Moylett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1992No. DC D890539M CA A60930 SC S37110, SC S37148Published

1Opinion of the Court

836 P.2d 1329 (1992)

313 Or. 540

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review/Petitioner on Review,

v.

Lawrence William MOYLETT, Petitioner on Review/Respondent on Review.

DC D890539M; CA A60930; SC S37110, SC S37148.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 6, 1990.

Decided July 16, 1992.

William Uhle, Portland, filed the petition and argued the cause for petitioner on review/respondent on review.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review/petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API