Legal Opinion

Frame v. Nehls

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 102139, Calendar No. 11Published

1Opinion of the Court

550 N.W.2d 739 (1996)

452 Mich. 171

Gina E. FRAME (now Stephens), Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Jay J. Franklin NEHLS, Defendant, and

Stephen Nehls, Petitioner-Appellee.

Docket No. 102139, Calendar No. 11.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued November 7, 1995.

Decided July 3, 1996.

Miller, Johnson, Snell & Cummiskey, P.L.C. by Harry Contos, Jr., Kalamazoo, for plaintiff.

Ford, Kriekard, Domeny & Byrne by Richard D. Stroba, Portage, for defendant.

BOYLE, Justice.

In this case, we interpret M.C.L.A. § 722.27b; M.S.A. § 25.312(7b), the section of the Child Custody Act, M.C.L.A. § 722.21 et seq.; M.S.A. § 25.312(1) et…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API