Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1993PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The Defendant, David Lawrence, has appealed his conviction of driving while under the influence of an intoxicant, third offense, in violation of T.C.A. § 55-10-401. He was also convicted of violating the implied consent provision of T.C.A. § 55-10-406(a)(3) for refusing to submit to a blood-alcohol test. We granted the Defendant’s Rule 11 Application to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his conviction under T.C.A. § 55-Í0-401, which makes it unlawful to “drive or to be in physical control” of an automobile while under the influence of an intoxicant.

I

T…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Farmer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. State v. GhylinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hopson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. City of Kansas City v. TroutnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. City of Naperville v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. State v. LoveArizona Supreme Court · 1995

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API