Legal Opinion

United States v. Furuya

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1927No. 2972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Appellee made an importation of English-Japanese dictionaries at the port of Portland, Oreg. These were classified by the collector under paragraph 1310 of the Tariff Act of 1922 as “printed books, leather bound, not chiefly foreign,” at 25 per centum ad valorem, and as “printed books, cloth bound, not chiefly foreign,” at 15 per centum ad valorem. The importer protested, claiming the books to be free as books printed chiefly in a foreign language, under paragraph 1529 of said act, or as unenumerated manufactured articles under paragraph 1459, or by similitude under paragraph 1460 thereof. On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. NelsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. Petry Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. University of Chicago v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. United States v. KerbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API